What is Materiality Assessment?
Companies use this structured process to figure out which environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics matter the most to their business and stakeholders. There are 2 types of materiality, and understanding both is key to a complete assessment:
- Impact Materiality
- Financial Materiality
Through it, you get to know:
- Which sustainability issues significantly impact your operations?
- Which ones are most important to people who care about your performance?
Internal teams and external stakeholders help companies collect diverse perspectives and rank issues. This prioritisation guides decision-making and resource allocation, making ESG efforts more focused and strategic.
Materiality assessment serves as a foundational step for credible reporting under global standards like GRI and CSRD. It is an essential requirement under India's BRSR. The earlier you complete this assessment, the more likely it is that your sustainability strategy aligns with regulatory expectations and stakeholder needs.
Materiality Assessment – Key Metrics
Modern ESG frameworks evaluate sustainability priorities through two key perspectives. A structured materiality assessment helps organisations understand both the impact of their operations and the financial implications of ESG risks.
The Two Types of Materiality
- Impact Materiality (Inside-Out Perspective): Assesses how business activities affect the environment and society, including emissions, labour practices, and community impact.
- Financial Materiality (Outside-In Perspective): Examines how ESG risks and opportunities influence financial performance, regulatory exposure, and long-term business value.
| Metric | What It Shows |
|---|
| ~80% of companies conduct materiality assessments | Materiality assessment has become a standard practice in sustainability reporting. |
| 85% of companies already apply double materiality | Companies increasingly evaluate both impact and financial risks in ESG reporting. |
| 67% of North American and 66% of European investors consider integrated materiality highly relevant | Investors expect companies to analyse both financial and societal impacts. |
| ~1,200 ESRS data points under CSRD reporting | Demonstrates the scale of ESG data companies must evaluate through materiality assessments. |
| 54% of companies say identifying material impacts, risks, and opportunities is their top priority | Organisations rely on materiality assessments for strategic ESG decision-making. |
Why Materiality Assessment Matters
A materiality assessment helps organisations focus on the ESG issues that truly matter. Companies must not divide their efforts across too many sustainability topics — most impactful areas are the best to prioritise. The clarity strengthens ESG strategy, improves reporting quality, supports long-term decisions, and supports regulatory compliance.
Supports regulatory compliance
A structured materiality assessment process helps organisations meet disclosure requirements under BRSR, GRI, and CSRD by identifying and documenting material ESG topics.
Builds investor confidence
Clear prioritisation of sustainability risks and opportunities demonstrates transparency and strengthens credibility with investors and regulators.
Improves resource allocation
The materiality assessment framework helps companies focus time, budget, and effort on ESG areas that drive the most meaningful impact.
Strengthens stakeholder trust
Engaging employees, customers, investors, and communities during the materiality assessment methodology ensures that ESG priorities reflect real stakeholder concerns.
Enhances ESG ratings and reporting quality
A well-documented materiality assessment report provides a strong foundation for ESG disclosures and helps improve external ESG ratings and evaluations.
Get guidance on prioritising ESG issues and turning insights into action.
Our experts help you run a clear materiality assessment process aligned with BRSR, GRI, and CSRD.
Types of Materiality
Two approaches dominate modern materiality practice. Single materiality looks only at how ESG issues affect company finances; double materiality also weighs the company's impact on society and the environment.
Single Materiality
Investor-centric
- Definition
- Stresses how ESG issues impact the company's financial performance, risks, and opportunities.
- Primary Perspective
- Investor-centric. Prioritises ESG factors that could influence financial outcomes or enterprise value.
- Key Focus Area
- Financial risks such as climate risk, regulatory changes, supply chain disruptions, and operational costs.
- Frameworks
- TCFD, ISSB / IFRS Sustainability Standards.
- Reporting Scope
- Narrower scope focused on financial materiality for investors and financial stakeholders.
Double Materiality
Dual perspective
- Definition
- Examines both financial impact on the company and the company's impact on society and the environment.
- Primary Perspective
- Dual perspective. Considers financial risks and broader environmental and social impacts.
- Key Focus Area
- Environmental and social impacts such as emissions, human rights, labour practices, biodiversity — along with financial implications.
- Frameworks
- CSRD / ESRS, GRI Standards.
- Reporting Scope
- Broader sustainability scope covering stakeholder impact and financial risks.
Materiality Assessment Process Explained
A structured materiality assessment process helps organisations identify and prioritise ESG issues that are most relevant to their business and stakeholders. The process combines stakeholder insights with data-driven analysis to ensure sustainability efforts focus on areas that matter most.
01
Topic Identification
Identify potential ESG topics relevant to the organisation’s industry, operations, and regulatory field — climate impact, resource use, labour practices, governance, and supply chain risks. Define the assessment scope and key stakeholder groups.
02
Stakeholder Engagement
Gather perspectives through surveys, workshops, and interviews to understand which ESG issues stakeholders consider most important — ensuring the assessment reflects real expectations and concerns.
03
Scoring and Analysis
Each topic is evaluated based on its impact on the business and importance to stakeholders. Scores are assigned using materiality assessment tools to prioritise issues effectively.
04
Matrix Creation
Prioritised topics are plotted on a materiality matrix with business impact on one axis and stakeholder importance on the other. Top-right quadrant issues are the most material.
05
Validation and Integration
Results are reviewed with leadership teams to validate findings. The most material issues are then integrated into the sustainability strategy, risk management, and ESG disclosures.
ESG Topics Covered in Materiality
A materiality assessment evaluates a wide range of environmental, social, and governance topics to determine which issues are most relevant to the organisation and its stakeholders. These topics vary by industry, geography, and regulation but generally fall under three broad ESG categories.
Environmental
- Climate change and greenhouse gas emissions
- Energy consumption and resource efficiency
- Water use and water stewardship
- Waste management and circular economy practices
- Biodiversity protection and ecosystem impact
Social
- Labour practices and employee well-being
- Human rights across operations and supply chains
- Workplace health and safety
- Community engagement and social impact
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion
Governance
- Board structure and governance practices
- Anti-corruption and ethical business conduct
- Data privacy and cybersecurity
- Supply chain governance and responsible sourcing
- Regulatory compliance and risk oversight
Frameworks That Require Materiality Assessment
Materiality is not optional under modern ESG frameworks — it's the gating step that determines what gets disclosed. The three frameworks most directly relevant to Oren's clients all require a structured assessment.
Oren's Materiality Assessment Approach
Oren combines ESG expertise with a technology-driven platform to deliver structured, data-backed materiality assessment solutions. The approach blends stakeholder engagement, regulatory alignment, and AI-enabled analysis to ensure companies identify and prioritise ESG issues effectively.
01
Planning and Scoping
Define the assessment scope, objectives, and regulatory context. Oren's team aligns the framework with relevant standards such as GRI, SASB, BRSR, and CSRD while forming cross-functional project teams.
02
Issue Identification
A comprehensive list of ESG topics is created using peer benchmarking, regulatory standards, and industry analysis to reflect sector-specific risks and opportunities.
03
Stakeholder Engagement
Engage employees, investors, customers, and suppliers through surveys, interviews, and workshops to capture diverse perspectives and expectations.
04
Prioritisation and Scoring
ESG topics are evaluated based on business impact and stakeholder relevance. Using advanced tools, issues are scored and mapped to identify the most critical sustainability priorities.
05
Data Collection and Analysis
Supporting ESG data is gathered and analysed through the Oren Sustainability Hub, enabling centralised data management, benchmarking, and AI-driven insights.
06
Validation and Reporting
Findings are validated with leadership teams and key stakeholders. The final report includes a clear materiality matrix, priority ESG topics, and actionable recommendations aligned with global frameworks.
Understand what truly matters in your ESG strategy.
Connect with our team to start your materiality assessment.
Consequences of Skipping Materiality Assessment
Skipping materiality assessment turns ESG reporting into guesswork, not strategy. The cost shows up across strategy, compliance, and brand.
1. Misaligned ESG strategy
Sustainability priorities don't reflect what matters most to stakeholders or investors, eroding strategic focus.
2. Poor resource allocation
Time and money get spent on low-impact issues while the highest-priority topics remain underfunded.
3. Weak regulatory compliance
Disclosure gaps emerge in reports under standards like CSRD, GRI, or BRSR — increasing audit and enforcement risk.
4. Lower stakeholder trust
Disclosures appear superficial or irrelevant when they aren't anchored to a structured materiality process.
5. Reputational damage and ESG rating drops
Material risks that go ignored or get misreported translate into brand damage and downward rating revisions.
Avoid ESG guesswork.
Get expert guidance on building a robust materiality assessment framework.
